Ozawa positive about granting local voting rights to non-Japanese.

see original article here .

I’d say that, if true, this would certainly be a move in the right direction.  However, the article goes on to state that 

“bringing [the proposal] to the Diet may not be easy because Kokumin Shinto (People’s New Party), one of two junior ruling coalition partners of the DPJ, has expressed its opposition, saying granting suffrage to non-Japanese could destabilize the nation.”

I’m sorry but in a country where the non-Japanese represent what only about 1 to 1.5% of the total population how is it even remotely possible that giving them the right to vote in LOCAL eletions could  ”destabilize” the nation.  I certainly hope that this type of borderline xenophobic comment does not go unquestioned.  In my typical over-reactionary style I would say that whichever politician said this should immediately lose his/her job and be subject to 40 lashes across the backside with a bamboo rod (said punishment to be meted out prefereably by a non-Japanese person).  In fact you know what … I volunteer for the job. 

It seems that this example of borderline xenophobia is unfortunately not limited to this one case.  In fact, a quick Google search brought up a Japan Probe article from last year that covered this same issue. 

I’m now going to say something that will show exactly how dumb I can be.  Politicians, people everywhere please wake up.  There is no reason that we can’t all get along with each other.  Japanese people you don’t need to fear that “foreigners” are going to overthrow your governement and your country.  Honestly, it’s that line of thinking that directly led to WWII.  And “foreigners living in Japan”, quit complaining about discrimination and racism, most Japanese people are really really wonderful people… don’t let a few rotten xenophobic apples sour you on living in Japan.

Beginner’s License vs. Regular License

If you have spent more than 90 days, but less than 1 year in the country that issued your driver’s license you will be eligible for a beginners license only.

If you have spent more than 1 year in total (not necessarily consecutive) in the country that issued your driver’s license you will be eligible for a regular license.

A beginner’s license holder is required to display a beginner’s mark sticker for the first 12 months after issue of the Japanese license, and will be credited with 3 demerit points only. (compared to 6 for a regular license) No other restrictions are placed on beginner’s license holders.

Both types of Japanese driver’s license are valid for a maximum of 3 years from the date of issue.

Test Required or Non-Required?

The process of license conversion changes according to the country that issued your foreign license.
Applicants are divided into the following two categories:

Test Non-Required
Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Korea Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, The Netherlands, United Kingdom.

Applicants holding drivers licenses issued in any of the above 22 countries, and one area, listed above do not need to sit for either the written or driving tests when converting their foreign licenses.

Test Required
Applicants holding drivers licenses from countries not listed under the “Test Non-Required” heading above are required to pass both written and driving tests to complete the conversion process.

Why?
Countries are separated in each category according to the driving safety record. The Japanese government feels it is not necessary for those people from countries that have an equal or better safety record to take a written or driving test. Please feel free to check with us if you are not sure which category you fall under.

Driving School or No Driving School?

1.  Japanese law has always said that Foreigners were required to have Natl. Health Insurance – no exceptions, no matter what you may have heard from your various employers over the years.

2.  Because of No. 1, it means that you were actually required to join the Natl. Health Insurance when you first came to Japan.  For most of us who were on Visas sponsored by our employers this meant that our employer was responsible for signing us up for both the Pension and the Health Insurance (in this case it is called the Employee’s Natl. Health Insurance) within 4 days of beginning our employment.  Let me guess … your employer told you that since you weren’t Japanese you didn’t qualify for either the pension or the health and advised you to buy private health insurance.  For those of us who were going to be self-employed (very few I’m sure) it meant that the day you got your Gaijin card you were also supposed to stop at the Health Insurance section of your Ward office and sign-up for National Health Insurance. 

3.  The Ward office is legally entitled to charge you for up to 2 years of back-due health insurance payments.  That’s right, up to 2 years back even though you weren’t part of the system.  I can see the sense in making Foreigners have to pay the monthly premiums starting from now, but this system of back-charging the payments for 2 years seems illogical and arbitrary.  So, this means that when you go sign-up for the health insurance (which you will do if you want to have your visa renewed) the Ward official is going to tell you that not only do you have to pay going forward but you also have to pay for the last 2 years of “missed” monthly premium payments.  What this amounts to is that to clear this mess up you are probably looking at paying somewhere close to 550,000 yen … if you’re lucky you’ll get a decent Ward official who will let you have an installment plan.

Below is the text of the original article that broke the story in the Japan Times.

In your wallet or somewhere at home, do you have a blue or pink card showing that you are enrolled in one of Japan’s national health and pension programs? If not, and if you are thinking of extending your stay here, you may want to think about a recent revision to visa requirements for foreign residents. The changes, which the Justice Ministry says were made in order to “smooth out the administrative process,” may have major consequences for foreign residents and their future in Japan.

On a drab, rainy Sunday in June, a group of foreign workers gathered at the office of the National Union of General Workers Tokyo Nambu in Shimbashi to discuss an equally drab topic: social insurance. According to a new immigration law passed by the Diet earlier this month, foreign residents will be required to show proof of enrollment in Japan’s health insurance program in order to renew or apply for a visa after April 1, 2010.

Surrounded by giant protest signs, leaflets and a Che Guevara poster, a quiet anxiety hung in the room as participants listened to the seminar. A handful of attendees were young, but most were middle-aged or approaching retirement age. Many had been working in Japan for years and had never been told anything about insurance, while others were aware of the program but had been dissuaded by their employers from joining it.

Louis Carlet, deputy secretary of Nambu, laid it down for everyone in the room to understand. There are a few basic things that all foreigners in Japan have to know, he explained: first, that everyone over the age of 20 in Japan is required to enroll in an approved Japanese government health insurance scheme and pension fund. If you are under 75 and working at a company that employs more than five people, this most likely means the shakai hoken (social insurance) program; if you are unemployed, self-employed or retired, the equivalent system is the kokumin kenko hoken and kokumin nenkin (national health insurance and pension). The only people exempt are sailors, day laborers, and those working for companies employing less than five people, or for firms without a permanent address (e.g. a film set).

The two systems cover different ground, all of which is explained in detail at www.sia.go.jp/e/ehi.html. Roughly, shakai hoken consists of two parts: kenko hoken (health insurance), which covers 70 percent of your medical costs and 60 percent of lost wages due to illness, and kosei nenkin (pension insurance), which provides a pension after age 65 for those who have paid into the system. The two are inseparable, and anyone enrolled in shakai hoken through their employer automatically pays into both. The kokumin kenko hoken (national health insurance) and kokumin nenkin (national pension) package offers similar coverage but is not provided through an employer.

The bottom line is that all residents of Japan (except those mentioned above) have to be enrolled in one or other of the two systems. The revised visa laws, therefore, should pose no threat to anyone’s visa renewal, because every foreigner in Japan should already be enrolled.

However, the reality is that most foreigners in Japan do not have either form of insurance. For example, a 2004 survey by Hiroshi Kojima of the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research found that only 28.3 percent of Japanese Brazilians in Iwata City, Shizuoka Pref., had any kind of health insurance, and that of these only a third were enrolled in shakai hoken. Another survey in 2009 found that just one out of 27 manufacturing companies had enrolled its foreign employees in workers’ compensation, leaving thousands of foreigners ineligible for any form of assistance when the economic downturn hit Japan last year, leading to mass layoffs.

“I’ve been in Japan for the last 15 years, and nobody told me about these programs,” said one attendee at the seminar, triggering a wave of nervous nods around the room. “What’s going to happen to me? Can I get my past employers to pay up?”

When insurance becomes a requirement for visa renewal next year, those who are not currently enrolled may be obliged to pay for fees that should have been deducted from their salaries had they been properly enrolled by their companies. While the government can only bill employers and employees up to the past two years, it’s a sizable sum of money that many people may not have readily available. Mercifully, local ward offices (kuyakusho) generally allow new enrollees to pay in installments, but their employers may not be so lucky if they are found to have knowingly broken the law by failing to enroll staff in national insurance.

If employers in Japan are obliged to register all employees in shakai hoken, why have so many foreigners been left out?

The chief reason is cost: Carlet explained that companies are required to cover at least 50 percent of their employees’ pension and health insurance premiums, which works out to roughly a tenth of the monthly salary. That’s about ¥30,000 monthly for every worker earning a salary of ¥250,000 — a huge sum of money that can threaten the very survival of a business.

“Billions of yen are at stake for the companies,” stressed Carlet, noting that foreigners are often offered higher wages than their Japanese counterparts to make up for the fact that have to pay for their own private insurance.

Foreign workers often hear a litany of reasons why they should not be enrolled in shakai hoken, or are simply not told about it at all. Employers would have a much tougher time leaving their Japanese staff off the system, argues Carlet, as many associate shakai hoken with a certain social status — those left out of the system tend to be in insecure employment such as day labor and very short-term contract work. For many Japanese workers, nonenrollment implies that their company either doesn’t value them as a long-term employee or simply doesn’t have the funds to cover the cost of insurance.

Apart from the sizable dent it makes on the average paycheck, there are a number of reasons why shakai hoken can seem unappealing for foreigners. For starters there’s the pension: Even though foreigners are required to pay into the system, they won’t actually get the money back until they have paid in for at least 25 years. Those who don’t spend a quarter of a century diligently paying pension fees in Japan can use a kara kikan (empty period) option that allows workers to count years spent working abroad, but only provided that they get permanent residency in Japan before turning 65.

The laws aren’t so accommodating for those who choose to leave Japan permanently and want to claim their money back. As Masahito Azuma, a representative of the Social Insurance Agency (SIA), explains, there is “a lump sum known as dattai ichijikin (lump-sum withdrawal payment) that repays up to three years of contributions (¥249,480).”

But how about if you have contributed money into the pension scheme for more than 10 years? “The maximum (payout) is still three years.” Azuma adds that you would also have to file your application within two years of leaving Japan.

As for health insurance, some foreign workers find little comfort in the fact that shakai hoken covers most of their medical costs, because some well-known English-speaking clinics don’t accept Japanese insurance anyway. For example, at the Hiroo International Clinic based in Minami-Azabu, one of Tokyo’s most diverse neighborhoods, patients can receive medical services in impeccable English, but none of the costs would be covered by Japanese insurance.

“You would have to pay the full cost upfront,” explains Dr. Isao Tsutsumi, adding that his clinic doesn’t accept Japanese insurance because it would oblige him to see Japanese patients and lead to reduced time for individual patients.

It’s not clear why these changes are occurring now. When pressed for an explanation, a representative of the Ministry of Justice (who declined to give her name) replied that it was merely carrying out the Cabinet’s three-year plan for regulatory reform.

“We’re simply acting on the suggestions of the government and the Immigration Bureau,” she said. “The new rule would help the bureau confirm the situation of those enrolled in social insurance, and also encourage the enrollment of those who haven’t done so already.”

Regardless of how people feel about the national health insurance system, the fact is that enrollment is mandatory for residents of Japan, and the new visa requirement merely draws attention to this.

Carlet finds it “bizarre” that some firms claim their foreign workers wanted to be left off the pension and insurance schemes; it’s the law, he says, and employees can “opt out” of it no more than Warren Buffett can “opt out” of paying income tax.

Unfortunately, many companies get away with hiring foreigners without enrolling them in pension and insurance plans because the SIA tends not to crack down on employers with uninsured workers unless certain standards are violated. For example, companies legally have to enroll part-timers if they have been working for the firm more than two months, but the SIA doesn’t necessarily investigate unless an employee is working three-quarters of the hours of a full-time employee (30 hours in most cases). Some language schools get around this by counting only the lesson hours of their employees (28 hours per week maximum) and ignoring their preparation time, while others like Gaba Corp. claim their instructors are subcontractors, who are not eligible for benefits, rather than actual employees.

It’s a lot like driving on a road with an 80-kph limit: It’s illegal to drive 85 kph, but police will only crack down on those going 90 and over, leading many employers to break the law with impunity.

When national health insurance becomes a visa condition in April, many companies will be forced to address these issues as some foreign employees decide to settle in Japan. Clyde Grimm, a curriculum supervisor at the Kanda Institute of Foreign Languages, explains that many foreigners come to work in Japan and end up committed to living in the country. “A lot of us weren’t planning to stay for long,” he shrugs. “But you meet someone, you get married, and you might end up spending your whole life in Japan.”

Whether intended or not, one consequence of forcing non-Japanese residents to become fully paid-up members of society with access to Japan’s social safety net may be that more foreigners feel they have a stake in staying on and making Japan their permanent home.

While it may result in administrative nightmares, the new visa requirements could lead to shifting dynamics between foreigners and their Japanese employers. No longer can these workers be viewed as shifty, temporary staff existing separately from their Japanese colleagues in a legal twilight zone of Japanese labor practices.